EARTH'S 4TH DEADLIEST TERRORISTS ARE APPROACHING THE ATLANTIC. WHY? WHAT DOES IT PORTEND FOR NIGERIA?
![]() |
Armed Fulani Herdsmen |
Preoccupied with everyday living, unruffled politicking, unrestricted
worship, busy days and quiet nights, Southern Nigerians have been paying little
or no attention to the fact that two of Earth’s top 4 deadliest terrorist
groups are at home and active in Nigeria. Popular Boko Haram have been
constrained to the North East but the other are nomadic unchecked. Now, having
restricted their operations to regions that separate North from South, they’ve finally
announced their planned ubiquity beginning with an audacious assault on South
Eastern State of Enugu on Monday 25th April. They are the Fulani militants.
They’ve ransacked communities that lie on their grazing
routes since 2010 (actually for decades), leaving thousands dead, more injured,
tens of thousands displaced, with assets worth millions of naira destroyed on
their exit. The ascension to power of Muhammadu Buhari, a Fulani, suspiciously coincides
with the stepping up of their degree of deadliness.
But The Igbos Are Not United
For centuries, the Fulanis have traversed the breadth of
West Africa unimpeded, not by pre-modern hostile cultures; and not by modern
day immigration. The trend of slaughtering owners of farms is however a 20th
craving they developed. While they pounded Middle Belt states again and again,
other Southerners wondered why the Federal Government would not as little as
release a statement to condemn the attacks; and the indigenes would not stop
them. But now, the militants are through with the intervening region and are at
the door steps of the interior South. They are going closer to the Atlantic
coast and this advancement will surely evoke a different kind of response.
South East Nigeria, occupied by the Igbo ethnic group, is
the epicenter of calls for the breakup of the country. And their primary reason
can be summarized as hatred from and for the Northerners consisting of the Hausa/Fulani
tribes. Having endured and survived pogroms in Northern Nigeria leading to the
Nigerian civil war of 1967, and several perceived follow-up acts of persecution
– well documented – the Igbos were nearly unanimous in rejecting the presidency
of Muhammadu Buhari in the March 2015 elections. As a result, odium between
Hausa/Fulani and the Igbos is still very high.
Already, many southern Nigerians on Social media are calling
for self-defence, citing the silence of the Buhari administration, his spokesperson’s
admittance of “working in silence”, and the well established inability of the
nation’s security forces to contain the daring Fulani marauders – especially as
Boko Haram in the extreme north and Niger Delta militant threats have stretched
them thin. We must keep in mind that the generations of Igbos who suffered the
perils of the Civil War are long past. The present generation of young Igbos
neither listen to their elders nor possess deference for chilling history.
Unfortunately for them, and fortunately for Nigeria, they are not united too.
No Logistic Problem
But the Hausa/Fulani are everywhere inside Nigeria. In every
state, they have their community. In
cities further south where there have been little or no inter-ethnic tensions,
these communities exist. In Calabar, they call it Bogobiri. In Uyo, Nasarawa;
and in Port Harcourt they call it simply Slaughter. In fact, in PH, at
Slaughter, they have their own ‘agberos’, their mosques are built there, and if
there’s any ethnic clash, they mobilize and protect themselves. Imagine that
these brazen Fulani militants decide to advance till they can see the Ocean;
these settlements will automatically serve as bases and barracks. What other
logistic problem have they?
What a Global Terrorism Index publication of 2015 designates
as Fulani militants was responsible, according to the report, for the death of
1229 in 2014r. Hundreds more have been added to that figure in 2015 and 2016.
In Nigeria, victims and survivors alike no longer separate Fulani militants
from Fulani herdsmen. They’re now one and the same. How else can one explain countless
herdsmen armed with assault rifles captured on camera?
According to
Secretary to the Government of Benue State - which is a frequent target region
of the militants - Barrister Targema Takema, speaking on a national radio
interview, natives of the State had cohabited with the nomads for ages until
recently when a different set of Fulani began to arrive. The farming
communities started complaining of herdsmen leading their cow herds into crop
farms and destroying agricultural assets worth millions of naira. As they began
to take measures to prevent further occurrence of these widely confirmed incidences,
the herdsmen began to arrive closely followed by the dreaded Fulani militants.
They Will Head To The Atlantic If…
It is not unhealthy to imagine these Fulani herdsmen taking
their militants all the way through Southern Nigeria, to the ocean coast in the
future, for four reasons.
1.
The Sahara desert is expanding. The country is
presently losing about 350,000 square meters of its land mass to
desertification, which is advancing southward at an estimated rate of 0.6 kilometers
a year. This is according to www.fadeafrica.org. The website also records that
the activities of Fulani herdsmen is greatly responsible for desertification in
the north; and they’re heading south.
“In some areas, Nomads moving to less arid
areas disrupt the local ecosystem and increase the rate of erosion of the land.
Ironically, Nomads try to escape the desert, but with their land use practices,
ignorantly set off another process of desertification in their new settlement.
They will have to move soon taking with them their land use practices, leaving
a trail of desert behind, and the chain goes on.”
The desert is driving them down south. They
need more land to graze in.
2.
The return to agriculture. Crash in global oil
prices has driven more Nigerians back to farms. In most Southern states,
governments and private sector industry heads are not only advocating a return
to commercial agriculture, but are investing too. And that means, more people
are going back from cities to rural areas to reclaim their farmlands for
expansion from subsistent to commercial agriculture. Governments, like in Akwa
Ibom and Cross River, are packaging even more robust supports for the
re-emerging venture. But don’t Fulani herdsmen have destructive objectives?
3.
Fulani herdsmen are respecters of no man.
Nothing is beyond their imagination. Inherently, a Fulani man is forthright,
blunt and fearless – even the policies and communication style of the President
of Nigeria are proofs of this – to a fault. Their fearlessness frequently
transforms into thoughtlessness. This is why they can attack different regions
of ‘enemy territory’, on different fronts - thousands of miles apart -
simultaneously. They can breach the security of a former Presidential aspirant,
surrounded by his own tribesmen, and kidnap the man, demanding for ransom. They
can poison the source of drinking water of an entire community, carrying out
wanton crimes against humanity without thinking twice. They can attack the
convoy of an ex-military chief and former Senate president of the nation
without fearing his military escorts. They have achieved all these already and
there is no carnage too unthinkable for their conscience.
The Goodluck Jonathan administration,
according to a House of Representatives member from Taraba state, and one time
BBC correspondent in Jos, Nigeria, Rima Shawulu, did rebuild several dams to
enhance irrigation and reduce desertification in the North. Yet the Fulani
ignore their green grass, to head south.
4.
According
to Max Gbanite, a security consultant, speaking on an AIT programme, Focus
Nigeria recently, the Fulanis do not understand that in southern Nigeria,
unlike in the North, “every inch of land belongs to an individual, a family or
a community.” And you can’t just move into someone’s land and graze. Hence, if
they keep encroaching into the south, which they will due to 1, 2 and 3, more
land owners will kick against them and, without desiring to sound like a
prophet of doom, more Fulani militants will attack more towns and the rest is
left for the mind's eye.
Fulani Herdsmen already have settlements close to the
Atlantic shore, I’ve earlier mentioned. Southern Nigerians can expect their
militant sons in the near future, unless [emphasized] the leadership of Nigeria
come up with a solution for the nomadic culture.
The solution, I believe, that would come closest to
preventing the prediction of more Fulani herdsmen attacks is borrowed from
Gbanite. And that is a combination of creating cattle ranches across the nation
and providing a reorientation to Fulanis aiming to make them embrace cultural changes;
in effect, strategically abolishing ‘nomadism’ -“the way of life of a nomad”
according to my dictionary. For, creating grazing routes for them will most
certainly not be welcomed by those who stand to lose their property and the
temptation to graze beyond the created routes will dominate the minds of the
nomads.
Obudu Cattle Ranch, For Example
Besides, the herdsmen themselves would admit that they lose
hundreds of livestock subjecting them to those strenuous trips on foot. Next,
the animals can hardly be made to birth up to a calf per year, wandering as
they do. It also exposes the animals to all manner of diseases that end up in
the stomach of human beings. Whereas in a ranch, several scientific rounds of
research can be carried out to try to improve the breed of the cattle; the
country can now benefit from Cattle farming in monetary terms by managing a
more controlled farming system. Obudu cattle ranch was established by late Sir
Michael Okpara decades ago to cater to serve as a model for the rest of the
country.
The Igbos are not as easily forgiving. They are still
licking wounds of humiliation - reopened by frequent friction with their
Hausa/Fulani countrymen - from the 1967 war that claimed over 1 million of
them; and from several ethnic killings suffered by their brothers in northern
Nigeria. The agitation for their own country has been heating up lately, with
increased debates amongst them on continuing with Nigeria or not. With the
Fulani herdsmen invasion of Igboland, and taking into consideration the
thoughtlessness of their militants – prospecting that they will surely return;
more reasons to remain with Nigeria are getting eliminated. This is yet another
implication of the nagging Fulani herdsmen crusades.
If the tiers of Nigeria’s Government keep foot-dragging in containing
the Fulani herdsmen, they may prepare for anarchy. Once people are forced to
defend themselves; and none of the parties accepts to be the defeated foe, the
situation could degenerate so dreadfully that Boko Haram would be child’s-play;
Gbanite believes it can lead to a civil war. Senator Godwill Akpabio too. And
there are more who believe same.
Uduak Umo is a
Lagos/Uyo based PR consultant and Public interest researcher.
Find me on Twitter on @umo2013
Find me on Twitter on @umo2013
Comments